Abstract: The steel industry is one of the largest industrial water consumers — a 5 million ton/year integrated steel plant can require 150,000–250,000 m³/h of circulating cooling water, equivalent to the domestic water consumption of a medium-sized city. Cooling systems operating long-term under high hardness, high suspended solids, and high temperature conditions face severe scaling and corrosion problems that directly impact production safety and energy costs. This article begins with the typical scaling and corrosion mechanisms in steel cooling systems, introduces a combined chemical cleaning and high-pressure water jetting process, and presents post-cleaning corrosion inhibitor passivation solutions. A real engineering case study of a continuous casting secondary cooling water system demonstrates the complete workflow from cleaning to corrosion protection.

I. Unique Challenges of Steel Industry Cooling Systems

Steel plant cooling systems encompass blast furnace cooling staves, continuous casting secondary cooling water systems, rolling mill cooling water systems, oxygen lance cooling systems, and converter hood cooling, among other subsystems. Compared to general industrial circulating water, steel cooling water faces three compounding challenges: First, high makeup water hardness — most steel plants draw groundwater or surface water with CaCO₃ hardness typically in the range of 300–600 mg/L (as CaCO₃), far exceeding general industrial circulating water standards. Second, high suspended solids concentration — large amounts of dust and iron oxide scale from ironmaking and steelmaking processes enter the circulating water, with SS reaching 50–200 mg/L. Third, high temperatures — blast furnace cooling stave return water temperatures can reach 55–70°C, and elevated temperatures accelerate CaCO₃ precipitation and microbial growth.

These three factors combined cause scaling rates in steel cooling systems to far exceed those in general industrial settings. Taking continuous casting secondary cooling water systems as an example, spray nozzle apertures are only 2–5 mm; scaling causes uneven flow distribution, directly leading to uneven billet cooling, internal cracking, and surface defects. Scaling on blast furnace cooling staves is even more dangerous — every 1mm increase in internal scale thickness can raise stave body temperature by 40–60°C, accelerating refractory erosion and potentially causing cooling stave burnout. According to industry statistics, cooling system failures account for over 20% of unscheduled downtime in steel plants, with scaling and corrosion being the primary causes.

II. Scaling and Corrosion Mechanism Analysis

2.1 Scaling Mechanism

Deposits in steel cooling water systems can be classified into three types: water scale, corrosion product scale, and microbiological slime. Water scale is primarily CaCO₃, formed by the following mechanism: circulating water concentrates through evaporation in cooling towers, and dissolved Ca(HCO₃)₂ thermally decomposes into CaCO₃, CO₂, and H₂O. CaCO₃ has a solubility product of only 3.36×10⁻⁹ (25°C), making it highly prone to crystallize on heat transfer surfaces. Notably, steel cooling water pH typically ranges from 7.5 to 8.5, falling precisely within the alkaline range where CaCO₃ precipitation is most active.

Corrosion product scale consists primarily of iron oxides — Fe₂O₃, Fe₃O₄, and FeOOH — originating from uniform corrosion of piping and equipment. These corrosion products not only form scale layers themselves but also serve as nucleation sites for CaCO₃ crystallization, accelerating water scale formation. Microbiological slime is composed of iron bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), and heterotrophic bacteria. Iron bacteria oxidize dissolved Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺, depositing rust tubercles on pipe walls, while SRB produce H₂S under anaerobic conditions, triggering pitting corrosion.

2.2 Key Parameter Comparison

Deposit TypePrimary CompositionThermal Conductivity W/(m·K)Impact on Steel Cooling
Water ScaleCaCO₃ (80–95%)0.5–2.31mm scale reduces heat transfer efficiency by 20–30%; spray nozzle clogging
Corrosion Product ScaleFe₂O₃/Fe₃O₄/FeOOH0.6–2.9Under-deposit corrosion accelerates wall thinning; pipe perforation
Microbiological SlimeIron Bacteria/SRB/Heterotrophs0.2–0.6Pitting corrosion; H₂S stress corrosion cracking
Mixed Deposit (Actual Conditions)Combined (CaCO₃-dominant)0.3–1.5Carbon steel pipe thermal conductivity ~45 W/(m·K); deposit layer is only 1/30 to 1/150 of that

III. Cleaning Technology Solutions

3.1 Cleaning Method Selection

Steel cooling system cleaning requires a "deposit-specific approach" — selecting the appropriate method based on deposit type and pipe material. Carbon steel piping (accounting for over 90%) is sensitive to acidic cleaning agents and requires strict corrosion inhibitor compatibility; stainless steel and copper alloy components (instrument cooling pipes, oxygen lance copper tips) require specialized formulations.

Cleaning TargetRecommended MethodFormulation / Parameters
Carbon Steel Cooling PipesChemical Circulation CleaningSulfamic Acid 5–8% + Citric Acid 2–3% + BTA Corrosion Inhibitor + Surfactant Penetrant
Stainless Steel Heat ExchangersChemical Cleaning + PassivationCitric Acid 4–6% + EDTA 1–2% (chloride-free formulation to prevent stress corrosion)
Copper Alloy CoolersSpecialized Inhibited Chemical CleaningSulfamic Acid 3–5% + BTA Copper Inhibitor (pH controlled ≥3.5)
Open Cooling TowersHP Water Jetting + Chemical CleaningHigh-pressure water 500–800 bar for fill cleaning + chemical soaking for hard scale removal
Caster Secondary Cooling Spray NozzlesDisassembly + Chemical SoakingDilute acid soaking (pH 2.5–3.0) + ultrasonic cleaning

3.2 Combined Cleaning Process

Blue Star Cleaning employs a three-step combined process for steel cooling system cleaning: "High-Pressure Water Jetting + Chemical Circulation Cleaning + Passivation Pre-filming." Step one uses high-pressure water jetting (500–1,500 bar) to remove bulk deposits and soft slime layers from pipe inner walls, rapidly clearing blocked pipelines. Step two formulates a specialized chemical cleaning solution for closed-loop circulation cleaning, precisely matching acid cleaning agents and corrosion inhibitor formulations based on deposit sample analysis, with circulation time controlled at 4–12 hours depending on deposit thickness. Step three immediately performs passivation treatment after cleaning — using NaNO₂ or Na₃PO₄ to form a dense passive film on metal surfaces, providing rust protection for 30–60 days.

IV. Corrosion Protection System

Cleaning is only "treating the disease" — establishing a long-term corrosion protection mechanism is "addressing the root cause." Steel cooling system corrosion protection must be addressed at three levels:

① Operational Water Quality Control: Circulating cooling water requires continuous dosing of corrosion and scale inhibitors, dispersants, and biocides. For carbon steel systems, organophosphorus corrosion and scale inhibitors (HEDP + PAA) are recommended, combined with Zinc Sulfate as a cathodic inhibitor, with total phosphorus controlled at 5–8 mg/L. For stainless steel systems, Sodium Molybdate passivation-type inhibitor is recommended at 50–100 mg/L dosage. Biocide treatment uses alternating ClO₂ and non-oxidizing biocides (isothiazolinone), controlling total heterotrophic bacteria count below 10⁵ CFU/mL.

② Scheduled Chemical Cleaning: Steel cooling systems are recommended for comprehensive chemical cleaning every 12–18 months. Even with water treatment programs, long-term operation inevitably accumulates minor scale deposits — cleaning is triggered when operating parameters deviate from baselines (e.g., heat transfer temperature difference increase >15%, flow rate decrease >10%).

③ Coating and Lining Protection: For severely corroded pipe sections, post-cleaning long-term protection options such as epoxy resin coatings or rubber linings can be considered, with service lives reaching 5–10 years.

V. Engineering Case Study

Project Background: A continuous casting secondary cooling water system at an East China steel enterprise, with a design flow rate of 800 m³/h, total pipeline length approximately 3,500 meters (DN80–DN300 carbon steel pipes), and approximately 800 spray section branch pipes. After 5 years of operation, uneven spray water distribution emerged and billet corner crack rates increased. Inspection revealed main pipe deposit thickness of 2–4 mm, spray branch pipe blockage rate of 35%, circulating water Ca²⁺ concentration of 420 mg/L, and total iron of 8.5 mg/L.

Cleaning Solution: The Blue Star Cleaning technical team implemented zone-segmented cleaning. Main pipelines underwent chemical circulation cleaning — Sulfamic Acid as the primary agent combined with BTA corrosion inhibitor and Surfactant penetrant, circulated for 8 hours at a cleaning solution temperature controlled at 50–55°C. Spray branch pipes were disassembled, grouped, and soaked, with ultrasonic treatment applied. After cleaning, a NaNO₂ + Na₃PO₄ composite passivator was circulated for 2 hours to form a protective film.

Cleaning Results: Descaling rate >95%, pipe inner walls restored to bare metal appearance. Spray branch pipe blockage rate reduced from 35% to <2%. Post-cleaning coupon corrosion rate for carbon steel was 0.38 g/(m²·h), well below the national standard limit of 2.0 g/(m²·h). Billet corner crack rate decreased from 1.8% to 0.3%, yielding annual savings of approximately ¥1.2 million in maintenance and scrap losses.

VI. Summary and Recommendations

Steel industry cooling system cleaning is not a one-time "firefighting" action but should be integrated into a comprehensive equipment lifecycle management system. Key takeaways: First, deposit sample analysis and equipment surveys must be conducted before cleaning — steel cooling system deposit composition is complex (water scale + rust + slime), and indiscriminate "one-shot acid cleaning" without analysis yields poor results with high risk. Second, corrosion inhibition protection for carbon steel pipelines must be thorough — the selection and dosage of inhibitors such as BTA, Sodium Molybdate, and Urotropine directly affect cleaning safety. Third, water treatment chemicals must be dosed within 48 hours after cleaning to establish protection, otherwise freshly exposed metal surfaces will rapidly re-oxidize, negating all prior work.

Blue Star Cleaning has specialized in industrial equipment cleaning for 25 years, providing end-to-end services for the steel, chemical, power generation, and other industries — from deposit sample analysis and custom formulation development to cleaning execution and water quality management. All projects are staffed with dedicated safety officers and come with complete pre- and post-cleaning comparison data and written acceptance reports.

Contact: +86 18952832843  |  Web: www.lanxingqingxi.com

Service Coverage: Jiangsu (Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Zhenjiang, Yangzhou) · Zhejiang (Hangzhou, Ningbo) · Shanghai · Anhui (Hefei) · Shandong · Henan

© 2026 Danyang Blue Star Anti-corrosion Cleaning Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved | Source: www.lanxingqingxi.com